I was already a very staunch adversary of any one who spoke in favor of Human Rights especially in Indian context, as it anyways seems to be supporting everything that is inhuman. They support the naxalites against the police and Paramilitary forces, they buttress the militants against the armed forces, and they have the audacity to propose that Ajmal Kasab should not be hanged. Stupendous !!! They are all patients of the Stockholm Syndrome.
What makes the situation even more daft is when these protests are led by our so called emancipated women: Medha Patkar, Arundhati Roy, Teesta Setalvad, Brinda Karat to name a few, though their list is endless. I am surprised how do these women even define emancipation? To me they appear merely the Cheer Leaders of Terrorism. Every time something happens in the country that is anti national they are all at Jantar Mantar protesting in favor of it.
They call themselves the face of modern India and adopt the most redundant philosophies ever in existence. These women are leftists when the world renounced Leftist ideology almost a quarter century ago, so much for Modernism. They are women who in the name of being liberated make a livelihood by writing macabre tales of wanton killings. Actually its not their fault most of them come from the family of activists so hypocrisy seems to be very much coded in their DNAs, they are simply programmed like that.
I recently came across a woman lawyer who with great pride told me that she fights for womens rights, i was curious to know how, she said she files divorce cases for them, and for every divorce case filed she gets rs. 500 from the court. I didn't know how to give a proper reaction to what i had heard. i should rejoice that in the name of women liberation we can now disintegrate families or condole her ignorance.
These women protestors or activists as they like to call themselves these days all do the same work, some do at a grass root social level others do at a national or international level; they all Disinegrate - disintegrate families, society and nation. This woman files divorce cases, Arundhati Roy advocates a separate Kashmir, they support Mohammed Afzal ( its courtesy these protesters that he has not been hanged). There have also been the likes of those who wanted the death penalty for Dhananjoy Chatterjee revoked. I seriously need to know how these women define redemption. Its way too arduous for me to trying understand it.
Most of you would have taken me to be a misogynist or something on those lines. No i am not. I am a very strong believer of an egalitarian society, i just happen to define emancipation differently: I associate it with education and with the right to take a decision with due responsibility and all implications it may entail. i believe that when one asks for rights one is accountable to fulfill certain duties. Duties which are for the betterment of one's family, society and nation.
Here my quote for the day:
अहम् केतुर अहम् मूर्धा अहमुग्रा विवाचिनी ( Rigved 159 II)
Translation: I am the the ensignia, and the hallmark , i am the pinnacle and the perfection and i am the one with immaculate analytical aptitude.
PS: this is what the most ancient text on this planet: the Rigveda says on women, phew so much for modernism !!!
Gruß
Suyasha
one wonders: do you feel stronger on human rights activists or on feminists?
ReplyDeleteu r partially right, especially when it comes to human right activists for terrorists. These human right activists overlook the fact that when they defend these so called 'humans', they are actually arguing against the human rights of those thousands of innocent people who would be massacred as a consequence to awarding a life imprisonment to them instead of Capital Punishment. Merely imprisoning them would lead to more incidents like the Kandahar Plane Hijack to set free these assassins; not to forget the enormous revenue spent on keeping them in secure custody. However still I have my doubts on whether this alone would solve the problem, this would further give a reason to those claiming that Indians are torturing their people, they would now train young children in their madarasas to fight against cruelty. Punishing just one person is not the solution. These young people, (of the age of 23) are mere pawns in the hands of sharks. Filling venom in the mind of a young sapling would ultimately give birth to a serpent only. Although I do not blame these young terrorists completely, however, this does not absolve the harsh punishment they deserve.
ReplyDeleteAs for these women activists, they are very similar to the woman lawyer u talked about. In the name of charity and human rights, they merely want to serve their own interest. Same is the case of almost all lawyers, amassing huge wealth in the name of enviromental law cases, or for that matter women rights, rights of backward classes, so on and so forth.
Really liked the phrase 'CHEERLEADERS OF TERRORISM' .. very appropriate term and usage for the so called human activists.